How Updating My Beliefs Dissolved My Ego
There was no lightning bolt. No spiritual fireworks. No moment where the sky split open and whispered the secret of existence. My awakening—if I can call it that—was statistical. It was the slow, uncomfortable realization that “I” might be a flawed hypothesis.
The Problem With My Original Model
For most of my life, I ran on high-confidence assumptions:
- I am this body.
- My thoughts are me.
- What I feel must be true.
- The world is solid and separate from me.
I didn’t choose these beliefs. They came pre-installed. Family reinforced them. Media amplified them. Markets monetized them. I called it identity. In hindsight, it was confirmation bias disguised as a life.
The First Anomaly
The shift didn’t begin with God. It began with a breath.
One evening during meditation, I noticed something unsettling: the breath was happening on its own. I wasn’t “doing” it. The observation felt neither mystical nor profound—just quietly inconvenient. If breathing happened without me, what else did?
Soon I noticed thoughts arising uninvited, emotions flaring without approval, moments of joy appearing without cause. The old model—“I am the thinker, the doer, the center”—struggled to explain the data.
So I faced a choice: Ignore the anomaly. Or update the model.
I updated. My confidence in “I am the thinker” dropped—not to zero, but noticeably lower.
Neti Neti as Mental Debugging
Ancient traditions use the phrase neti neti—“not this, not that.” I began to see it not as mysticism, but as debugging.
Not the body. Not the thought. Not the emotion.
Each close examination weakened the sense of ownership. Sensation happened. Thought happened. Reaction happened. But the “owner” became harder to locate.
The process wasn’t dramatic. It was iterative. Less revelation, more recalibration.
Science, Spirituality, and the Same Discipline
Interestingly, the process felt scientific. Science eliminates false theories. Spiritual inquiry eliminates false identifications. In both cases, progress doesn’t come from finding absolute truth. It comes from reducing error.
The deeper the looking went, the more certainty gave way to humility. And humility, I realized, is what remains when you absorb both sides of “not this, not that.”
Even Awakening Felt Probabilistic
I refused to declare victory. Every insight felt provisional. Each realization reduced rigidity, but I knew the mind was capable of subtle self-deception.
So instead of saying, “I am enlightened,” I began to think: “The probability that I am a fixed, separate self seems… increasingly low.”
That shift changed everything. Not because I reached a conclusion. But because I stopped defending one.
When Updating Became Organic
At some point, something softened. I stopped actively recalculating. Fewer inner arguments, less tension, less need to defend being right. It felt… natural.
Not special. Not transcendent. Just less heavy.
Organic awakening didn’t arrive with insight. It arrived with reduced friction.
The Transparent Self
The self didn’t disappear. It became functional instead of fundamental. I still use the word “I.” I still plan. I still act. But the center feels lighter. Less like a fortress. More like a useful interface.
Walking happens. Thinking happens. Living happens. Without the constant background assertion: “This is me. This must be protected.”
The Quiet Convergence
What surprised me most was this: The more I updated my inner model, the more I saw parallels between mature science and mature spirituality.
At the edge of cosmology, scientists speak carefully. At the edge of contemplation, mystics speak carefully. Different tools. Same humility. Not fusion. Not agreement. Just shared restraint before mystery.
The Alchemist Washing a Cup
There was no final moment. One evening, I was washing a cup. Water ran over porcelain. Light bent across its curve. A thought arose to narrate the scene—and simply dissolved.
Nothing cosmic occurred. No message from the universe. Just movement without ownership. For the first time, that felt enough.
The Ongoing Update
The probability of a solid, permanent “I” didn’t hit zero. It simply stopped dominating the equation.
Life continues. Models update. Experience unfolds. No absolute conclusions. Only clearer seeing.
And somehow, that clarity feels more stable than certainty ever did.
If I had to name it, I wouldn’t call it enlightenment. I’d call it this: A mind willing to update. And a self light enough not to resist.


Leave a comment